CVE-2026-94379
📛 CVE Title
MISP: HTTP Method Bypass of Login Security Controls (Bruteforce Protection and Email OTP)
Description
The login() function in MISP's UsersController.php contained insufficient HTTP method validation for several security-critical code paths. The original code used an allowlist approach, checking only for specific HTTP methods (POST and PUT) before enforcing bruteforce protection, email one-time-password (OTP) verification, and login-failure logging. Because the checks were not exhaustive, an unauthenticated attacker could issue login requests using other HTTP methods and bypass all three security controls simultaneously. Specifically: - the bruteforce blocklisting check and attempt counter were skipped, allowing unlimited credential-guessing attempts without being rate-limited or blocked - the email OTP two-factor authentication step was skipped, defeating the second factor of authentication - login-failure events were neither logged nor counted, removing the audit trail and the mechanism that would normally trigger a blocklist entry. The security impact is the effective disabling of brute-force protection and multi-factor authentication for any attacker who can craft an HTTP request with a non-POST/PUT method to the login endpoint, potentially leading to credential compromise and unauthorized access to the MISP instance. Version affected: <2.5.47
Overview
- State
- PUBLISHED
- Assigner (CNA)
- CIRCL
- CVSS severity
- MEDIUM
- CVSS score
- 6.9 / 10
- CVSS vector
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N- Effective score
- 6.9 / 10 MEDIUM source: CNA overview
- CWE(s)
-
CWE-20,CWE-285 - Reserved
- 2026-09-21
- Published
- 2026-09-21 12:35 UTC
- Last updated
- 2026-09-21 15:21 UTC
- Source
- https://raw.githubusercontent.com/CVEProject/cvelistV5/main/cves/2026/94xxx/CVE-2026-94379.json
NVD triage scoring NVD CVE 2.0
Layer NVD adds on top of the CNA's CVE record — published / last-modified timestamps, exploitability / impact subscores, and the FIRST.org EPSS probability that this CVE will be exploited in the wild in the next 30 days.
- NVD published
- 2026-09-21 13:17:13 UTC
- NVD last modified
- 2026-09-21 16:17:30 UTC
NVD / KEV / EPSS data refreshed 2026-09-22 03:10 UTC. Re-run the 🛰 Backfill from NVD button above to refresh.
European Union Vulnerability Database ENISA EUVD
ENISA's official EU repository for curated vulnerability intelligence. Carries a separate identifier (EUVD-YYYY-NNNN) and frequently exposes an earlier-published description + CVSS than NVD does.
- EUVD ID
-
EUVD-2026-83905 - Assigner
- CIRCL
- Published
- Sep 21, 2026, 12:35:26 PM
- Updated
- Sep 21, 2026, 3:21:01 PM
- EUVD base score (CVSS 4.0)
-
6.9 / 10
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N - EUVD-reported EPSS
- 0.0000
- Vendors
- MISP
- Products
-
MISP (unspecified <2.5.47)
- Aliases
-
GHSA-3q8c-466v-vgx3
ENISA description: The login() function in MISP's UsersController.php contained insufficient HTTP method validation for several security-critical code paths. The original code used an allowlist approach, checking only for specific HTTP methods (POST and PUT) before enforcing bruteforce protection, email one-time-password (OTP) verification, and login-failure logging. Because the checks were not exhaustive, an unauthenticated attacker could issue login requests using other HTTP methods and bypass all three security controls simultaneously. Specifically: - the bruteforce blocklisting check and attempt counter were skipped, allowing unlimited credential-guessing attempts without being rate-limited or blocked - the email OTP two-factor authentication step was skipped, defeating the second factor of authentication - login-failure events were neither logged nor counted, removing the audit trail and the mechanism that would normally trigger a blocklist entry. The security impact is the effective disabling of brute-force protection and multi-factor authentication for any attacker who can craft an HTTP request with a non-POST/PUT method to the login endpoint, potentially leading to credential compromise and unauthorized access to the MISP instance. Version affected: <2.5.47
EUVD references (1)
Affected products (1)
| Vendor | Product | Versions | Platforms |
|---|---|---|---|
| MISP | MISP |
unspecified (affected)
|
— |
Vendor references (1)
References embedded in the original CVE record by the assigning CNA.
- Security patch patch
Web references (0)
DuckDuckGo results ranked by threat-intel / vendor advisory domains. Generated by the 🔎 Find references (web) button above — same flow as the Remediations search.
No web references attached yet.
NVD-tagged references (1)
Reference list NVD curates from the CNA record, vendor advisories, and third-party reports. The tag chips below are NVD's analyst-assigned categories.
- https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ef4dc19c6 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8
Remediations (10)
-
web:cvefeed.io
The following list is the news that have been mention CVE-2026-94379 vulnerability anywhere in the article. Results are limited to the first 20 news articles due to potential performance issues. EPSS is a daily estimate of the probability of exploitation activity being observed over the next 30 days.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:cvetodo.com
CVE-2026-94379 is a CVSS 6.9 medium-severity vulnerability in MISP. Full technical analysis, mitigations , and exploit status — updated in real time.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:msrc.microsoft.com
The Microsoft Security Response Center (MSRC) investigates all reports of security vulnerabilities affecting Microsoft products and services, and provides the information here as part of the ongoing effort to help you manage security risks and help keep your systems protected.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:senserva.com
Every Microsoft security patch (KB) and the CVEs it fixes, with severity, CVSS, and CISA KEV status. Cross-linked to the CVE reference.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:support.microsoft.com
This Hotpatch update for Windows 11, version 25H2 and 24H2 (KB5079420), improves functionality, performance, and reliability. To learn more about differences between security updates, optional non-security preview updates, out-of-band (OOB) updates, and continuous innovation, see Windows monthly updates explained. For information on Windows update terminology, see the different types of ...
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:support.sap.com
SAP security Patch Day Bulletin This post shares the information on security notes that remediate vulnerabilities discovered in SAP products. SAP strongly recommends that the customer visits the support portal and applies patches on priority to protect their SAP landscape. On 9th of June 2026 , SAP security patch day saw the release of 15 new security notes.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:www.dell.com
Dell OpenManage Enterprise remediation is available for multiple security vulnerabilities that may be exploited by malicious users to compromise the affected system.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:www.oracle.com
This Critical Patch Update contains 481 new security patches across the product families listed below. Please note that an MOS note summarizing the content of this Critical Patch Update and other Oracle Software Security Assurance activities is located at April 2026 Critical Patch Update: Executive Summary and Analysis.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:www.oracle.com
This Critical Patch Update contains 1448 new security patches across the product families listed below. Please note that a My Oracle Support (MOS) note summarizing the content of this Critical Patch Update and other Oracle Software Security Assurance activities is located at July 2026 Critical Patch Update: Executive Summary and Analysis.
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC -
web:www.tenable.com
The login() function in MISP's UsersController.php contained insufficient HTTP method validation for several security-critical code paths. The original code used an allowlist approach, checking only for specific HTTP methods (POST and PUT) before enforcing bruteforce protection, email one-time-password (OTP) verification, and login-failure logging. Because the checks were not exhaustive, an ...
2026-09-22 17:07 UTC
AI Forensic Analysis
Only Available for Registered Users. Sign in to view.
Raw JSON
The full cvelistV5 record. Download as CVE-2026-94379.json.
{
"containers": {
"adp": [
{
"metrics": [
{
"other": {
"content": {
"id": "CVE-2026-94379",
"options": [
{
"Exploitation": "none"
},
{
"Automatable": "yes"
},
{
"Technical Impact": "partial"
}
],
"role": "CISA Coordinator",
"timestamp": "2026-09-21T15:20:43.610267Z",
"version": "2.0.3"
},
"type": "ssvc"
}
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:21:01.092Z",
"orgId": "134c704f-9b21-4f2e-91b3-4a467353bcc0",
"shortName": "CISA-ADP"
},
"title": "CISA ADP Vulnrichment"
}
],
"cna": {
"affected": [
{
"modules": [
"UsersController (login endpoint)"
],
"product": "MISP",
"programFiles": [
"app/Controller/UsersController.php"
],
"repo": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
"vendor": "MISP",
"versions": [
{
"lessThan": "2.5.47",
"status": "affected",
"version": "unspecified",
"versionType": "semver"
}
]
}
],
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "iglocska"
}
],
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "<p>The login() function in MISP's UsersController.php contained insufficient HTTP method validation for several security-critical code paths. The original code used an allowlist approach, checking only for specific HTTP methods (POST and PUT) before enforcing bruteforce protection, email one-time-password (OTP) verification, and login-failure logging. Because the checks were not exhaustive, an unauthenticated attacker could issue login requests using other HTTP methods and bypass all three security controls simultaneously. Specifically: </p>\u2003- the bruteforce blocklisting check and attempt counter were skipped, allowing unlimited credential-guessing attempts without being rate-limited or blocked<br>\u2003- the email OTP two-factor authentication step was skipped, defeating the second factor of authentication<br><div>\u2003- login-failure events were neither logged nor counted, removing the audit trail and the mechanism that would normally trigger a blocklist entry.</div><div><br></div><p>The security impact is the effective disabling of brute-force protection and multi-factor authentication for any attacker who can craft an HTTP request with a non-POST/PUT method to the login endpoint, potentially leading to credential compromise and unauthorized access to the MISP instance.<br></p><div><br></div><p>Version affected: <2.5.47</p>"
}
],
"value": "The login() function in MISP's UsersController.php contained insufficient HTTP method validation for several security-critical code paths. The original code used an allowlist approach, checking only for specific HTTP methods (POST and PUT) before enforcing bruteforce protection, email one-time-password (OTP) verification, and login-failure logging. Because the checks were not exhaustive, an unauthenticated attacker could issue login requests using other HTTP methods and bypass all three security controls simultaneously. Specifically:\u00a0\n\n\u2003-\u00a0the bruteforce blocklisting check and attempt counter were skipped, allowing unlimited credential-guessing attempts without being rate-limited or blocked\n\u2003-\u00a0 the email OTP two-factor authentication step was skipped, defeating the second factor of authentication\n\u2003- login-failure events were neither logged nor counted, removing the audit trail and the mechanism that would normally trigger a blocklist entry.\n\n\n\n\nThe security impact is the effective disabling of brute-force protection and multi-factor authentication for any attacker who can craft an HTTP request with a non-POST/PUT method to the login endpoint, potentially leading to credential compromise and unauthorized access to the MISP instance.\n\n\n\n\n\nVersion affected: <2.5.47"
}
],
"impacts": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"descriptions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "CAPEC-1 Improperly Controlled Modification of Authentication Logic"
}
]
}
],
"metrics": [
{
"cvssV4_0": {
"Automatable": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Recovery": "NOT_DEFINED",
"Safety": "NOT_DEFINED",
"attackComplexity": "LOW",
"attackRequirements": "NONE",
"attackVector": "NETWORK",
"baseScore": 6.9,
"baseSeverity": "MEDIUM",
"privilegesRequired": "NONE",
"providerUrgency": "NOT_DEFINED",
"subAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"subConfidentialityImpact": "NONE",
"subIntegrityImpact": "NONE",
"userInteraction": "NONE",
"valueDensity": "NOT_DEFINED",
"vectorString": "CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N",
"version": "4.0",
"vulnAvailabilityImpact": "NONE",
"vulnConfidentialityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnIntegrityImpact": "LOW",
"vulnerabilityResponseEffort": "NOT_DEFINED"
},
"format": "CVSS",
"scenarios": [
{
"lang": "en",
"value": "GENERAL"
}
]
}
],
"problemTypes": [
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"description": "CWE-20 Improper Input Validation",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
},
{
"descriptions": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"description": "CWE-285 Improper Authorization",
"lang": "en",
"type": "CWE"
}
]
}
],
"providerMetadata": {
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T12:35:26.533Z",
"orgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"shortName": "CIRCL"
},
"references": [
{
"name": "Security patch",
"tags": [
"patch"
],
"url": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ef4dc19c6"
}
],
"solutions": [
{
"lang": "en",
"supportingMedia": [
{
"base64": false,
"type": "text/html",
"value": "<p>The fix replaces the allowlist-style HTTP method checks (is POST or PUT) with a denylist approach (is NOT GET) in all three security-critical branches of the login() function. This ensures that every non-GET HTTP method\u2014regardless of whether it is POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS, or any other\u2014triggers the bruteforce protection, email OTP verification, and login-failure logging code paths, closing the method-based bypass.</p>"
}
],
"value": "The fix replaces the allowlist-style HTTP method checks (is POST or PUT) with a denylist approach (is NOT GET) in all three security-critical branches of the login() function. This ensures that every non-GET HTTP method\u2014regardless of whether it is POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS, or any other\u2014triggers the bruteforce protection, email OTP verification, and login-failure logging code paths, closing the method-based bypass."
}
],
"title": "MISP: HTTP Method Bypass of Login Security Controls (Bruteforce Protection and Email OTP)",
"x_gcve": [
{
"extensions": {
"bcp-05-x-01": {
"ai_annotations": [
{
"ai_level": "generated",
"description": "Draft vulnerability metadata was generated from a git-format patch using an Ollama-hosted language model. Human validation is required before publication.",
"gna_source": 1,
"models": [
{
"gna_source": 1,
"identifier": "qwen3.8:27b",
"name": "qwen3.8:27b",
"source": "ollama"
}
],
"review_status": "review",
"scope": "record",
"tags": [
"ai-computer-assisted:llm-generated",
"ai-computer-assisted:classification"
]
}
]
},
"bcp-05-x-02": {
"x_patch2vuln": {
"assumptions": [
"The exact affected version range is not explicitly stated in the patch; the tag_version_boundary metadata indicates v2.5.47 with 143 commits after the fix, suggesting the fix landed shortly after 2.5.47, but the precise last-affected and first-fixed versions are not confirmed.",
"The CAPEC-1 mapping is the closest available pattern; the actual attack vector (HTTP method substitution) is a form of request parameter manipulation that does not have a dedicated CAPEC entry, so CAPEC-1 is used as the best approximation.",
"The CVSS vector assumes the MISP instance is exposed over a network and that the login endpoint is reachable without prior authentication, which is the standard deployment model for MISP.",
"The patch does not include a test case demonstrating the bypass; the analysis is based solely on the code diff and commit message.",
"It is assumed that the MISP framework (CakePHP) does not independently enforce HTTP method restrictions at a middleware layer that would have already blocked non-POST/PUT methods to this endpoint; the patch implies such enforcement was absent."
],
"capecRationale": [
{
"capecId": "CAPEC-1",
"rationale": "The attacker modifies a parameter of the authentication request (the HTTP method) to alter which security checks are executed, effectively modifying the authentication logic at runtime. This is the closest CAPEC to the observed bypass. Uncertainty: CAPEC-1 typically refers to modifying authentication logic in a more direct sense (e.g., altering credential checks), whereas here the modification is via the HTTP method header. However, no other CAPEC more precisely captures the act of altering a request attribute to skip authentication security controls."
}
],
"commit": "ef4dc19c6d4f029c3173e5fafea75a94c127f8b5",
"confidence": "medium",
"credits": [
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "reporter",
"value": "Jeroen Pinoy"
},
{
"lang": "en",
"type": "remediation developer",
"value": "iglocska"
}
],
"cvssRationale": "AV:N \u2013 the login endpoint is network-accessible. AC:L \u2013 the attack requires only changing the HTTP method in a request; no race conditions or complex setup. AT:N \u2013 no manipulation of the target system is needed. PR:N \u2013 the login endpoint is accessible without prior authentication. UI:N \u2013 no user interaction required. VC:L \u2013 bypass of bruteforce protection enables credential brute-forcing, potentially exposing user credentials. VI:L \u2013 bypass of email OTP (2FA) and failure logging compromises the integrity of the authentication process and audit trail. VA:N \u2013 no direct denial-of-service impact. SC/SI/SA:N \u2013 no secondary system impact is evidenced.",
"fixSummary": "The fix replaces the allowlist-style HTTP method checks (is POST or PUT) with a denylist approach (is NOT GET) in all three security-critical branches of the login() function. This ensures that every non-GET HTTP method\u2014regardless of whether it is POST, PUT, PATCH, DELETE, HEAD, OPTIONS, or any other\u2014triggers the bruteforce protection, email OTP verification, and login-failure logging code paths, closing the method-based bypass.",
"generatedAt": "2026-09-21T12:30:02.387878Z",
"generator": "patch2vuln.py",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"modelComparison": {
"rankings": [
{
"agreementScore": 9,
"assumptionCount": 5,
"confidence": "medium",
"model": "qwen3.8:27b",
"score": 5
}
],
"selectedModel": "qwen3.8:27b",
"selectionMethod": "deterministic-consensus-v1",
"selectionNotice": "The selected result is closest to model consensus; this heuristic does not establish factual correctness and human review remains required."
},
"patchSha256": "ff6f133b194fcd5c913990fce421bd56de7a12e488291a2ec7422d92284e71d8",
"patchSummary": "Three conditional expressions in UsersController::login() were changed. (1) The bruteforce-protection guard changed from $this->request->is(['post','put']) to !$this->request->is(['get']). (2) The email-OTP guard changed from $this->request->is('post') to !$this->request->is(['get']). (3) The login-failure handling guard changed from $this->request->is('post') || $this->request->is('put') to !$this->request->is('get'). All three changes invert the logic from an explicit allowlist of methods to a denylist that excludes only GET, so that any other HTTP method is treated as a state-changing login attempt subject to all security controls.",
"patchTruncated": false,
"patches": [
{
"commit": "ef4dc19c6d4f029c3173e5fafea75a94c127f8b5",
"patchSha256": "ff6f133b194fcd5c913990fce421bd56de7a12e488291a2ec7422d92284e71d8",
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ef4dc19c6.patch",
"sourceUrl": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ef4dc19c6.patch",
"subject": "fix: [security] insufficient check on http methods for the"
}
],
"source": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP/commit/ef4dc19c6.patch",
"subject": "fix: [security] insufficient check on http methods for the",
"tagVersionBoundary": {
"commits_after_fix": 143,
"repository": "https://github.com/MISP/MISP",
"tag": "v2.5.47",
"version": "2.5.47",
"version_type": "semver"
},
"weaknessRationale": [
{
"cweId": "CWE-20",
"rationale": "The root cause is that the application validated the HTTP method using an incomplete allowlist (POST, PUT) rather than rejecting all non-safe methods. This is a classic improper input validation flaw where the set of accepted values was not exhaustive, allowing unexpected methods to bypass security logic."
},
{
"cweId": "CWE-285",
"rationale": "The security controls (bruteforce protection, OTP enforcement, failure logging) are authorization/authentication enforcement mechanisms that were improperly applied only to a subset of HTTP methods, effectively allowing unauthorized bypass of these controls."
}
]
}
}
},
"recordType": "advisory",
"vulnId": "GCVE-1-2026-20013"
}
]
}
},
"cveMetadata": {
"assignerOrgId": "5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8",
"assignerShortName": "CIRCL",
"cveId": "CVE-2026-94379",
"datePublished": "2026-09-21T12:35:26.533Z",
"dateReserved": "2026-09-21T12:35:24.635Z",
"dateUpdated": "2026-09-21T15:21:01.092Z",
"state": "PUBLISHED"
},
"dataType": "CVE_RECORD",
"dataVersion": "5.2"
}