CVE-2016-10141
📛 CVE Title
SUSE: CVE-2016-10141: SUSE Linux Security Advisory
Description
An integer overflow vulnerability was observed in the regemit function in regexp.c in Artifex Software, Inc. MuJS before fa3d30fd18c348bb4b1f3858fb860f4fcd4b2045. The attack requires a regular expression with nested repetition. A successful exploitation of this issue can lead to code execution or a denial of service (buffer overflow) condition.
Overview
- State
- —
- Assigner (CNA)
- —
- CVSS severity
- MEDIUM
- CVSS score
- 5.0 / 10
- CVSS vector
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P- Effective score
- 5.0 / 10 MEDIUM source: CNA overview
- CWE(s)
- —
- Reserved
- —
- Published
- 2017-01-13 00:00 UTC
- Last updated
- —
- Source
- https://www.rapid7.com/db/vulnerabilities/suse-cve-2016-10141/
NVD triage scoring NVD CVE 2.0
Layer NVD adds on top of the CNA's CVE record — published / last-modified timestamps, exploitability / impact subscores, and the FIRST.org EPSS probability that this CVE will be exploited in the wild in the next 30 days.
- NVD published
- 2017-01-13 09:59:00 UTC
- NVD last modified
- 2026-06-17 00:39:08 UTC
- NVD CVSS v3.1
- 9.8 / 10 CRITICAL source: nvd@nist.gov
- NVD CVSS vector
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H- Exploitability subscore
- 3.9 / 10
- Impact subscore
- 5.9 / 10
- EPSS score
- 0.0365 (probability of exploitation in next 30 days)
- EPSS percentile
- 88.43% vs all CVEs — higher = more likely to be exploited, as of 2026-07-29
NVD-assigned CWE(s):
CWE-190
(differs from the CNA list above)
NVD / KEV / EPSS data refreshed 2026-07-30 12:40 UTC. Re-run the 🛰 Backfill from NVD button above to refresh.
European Union Vulnerability Database ENISA EUVD
ENISA's official EU repository for curated vulnerability intelligence. Carries a separate identifier (EUVD-YYYY-NNNN) and frequently exposes an earlier-published description + CVSS than NVD does.
- EUVD ID
-
EUVD-2016-1330 - Assigner
- mitre
- Published
- Jan 13, 2017, 9:00:00 AM
- Updated
- Aug 6, 2024, 3:14:42 AM
- EUVD-reported EPSS
- 3.6500
- Vendors
- n/a
- Products
-
n/a (n/a)
- Aliases
-
GHSA-6j4g-3pfp-hgj5
ENISA description: An integer overflow vulnerability was observed in the regemit function in regexp.c in Artifex Software, Inc. MuJS before fa3d30fd18c348bb4b1f3858fb860f4fcd4b2045. The attack requires a regular expression with nested repetition. A successful exploitation of this issue can lead to code execution or a denial of service (buffer overflow) condition.
Affected products — CPE 2.3 (1) NVD
NVD's normalized CPE 2.3 matchers, used by vendor tools (vulnerability scanners, asset managers) for automated detection. Compare with the CNA's free-text "Affected products" section above.
cpe:2.3:a:artifex:mujs:*:*:*:*:*:*:*:*
Vendor references (0)
References embedded in the original CVE record by the assigning CNA.
None in the CVE record.
MITRE references (3) cveawg.mitre.org
Pulled from MITRE's CVE Services API by the 🛰 Backfill from MITRE button.
- http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mujs.git%3Bh=fa3d30fd18c348bb4b1f3858fb860f4fcd4b2045 x_refsource_CONFIRM
- 95876 vdb-entry, x_refsource_BID
- https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697448 x_refsource_CONFIRM
Web references (0)
DuckDuckGo results ranked by threat-intel / vendor advisory domains. Generated by the 🔎 Find references (web) button above — same flow as the Remediations search.
No web references attached yet.
NVD-tagged references (6)
Reference list NVD curates from the CNA record, vendor advisories, and third-party reports. The tag chips below are NVD's analyst-assigned categories.
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95876 cve@mitre.org Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
- http://www.securityfocus.com/bid/95876 af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 Third Party AdvisoryVDB Entry
- https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697448 cve@mitre.org Issue Tracking
- https://bugs.ghostscript.com/show_bug.cgi?id=697448 af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108 Issue Tracking
- http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mujs.git%3Bh=fa3d30fd18c348bb4b1f3858fb860f4fcd4b2045 cve@mitre.org
- http://git.ghostscript.com/?p=mujs.git%3Bh=fa3d30fd18c348bb4b1f3858fb860f4fcd4b2045 af854a3a-2127-422b-91ae-364da2661108
Remediations (10)
-
web:csrc.nist.gov
Enterprise patch management is the process of identifying, prioritizing, acquiring, installing, and verifying the installation of patches, updates, and upgrades throughout an organization. Patching is more important than ever because of the increasing reliance on technology, but there is often a divide between business/mission owners and security/technology management about the value of ...
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:gemini.google.com
Meet Gemini, Google's AI assistant. Get help with writing, planning, brainstorming, and more. Experience the power of generative AI.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:github.com
Patch termsrv.dll so that multiple remote users can open an RDP session on a non-Windows Server computer - fabianosrc/TermsrvPatcher
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:jumpcloud.com
Master patch compliance with this technical guide covering vulnerability scanning, deployment processes, key metrics, and remediation best practices.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:krebsonsecurity.com
Microsoft expects that exploitation is more likely. May's Patch Tuesday is a welcome respite from April, which saw Microsoft fix a near-record 167 security flaws.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:tuxcare.com
It includes discovering vulnerabilities, evaluating their potential impact, prioritizing remediation efforts (including patching), and confirming the fixes. Patch Management Patch management, on the other hand, is the act of applying the necessary updates to fix known vulnerabilities. It's a critical component of vulnerability management.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:www.cve.org
At cve .org, we provide the authoritative reference method for publicly known information-security vulnerabilities and exposures
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:www.ibm.com
When you shouldn't patch : Managing your risk factors Overview Knowing your risk factor How to prioritize your organization's vulnerabilities When to slow down the patching process Cybersecurity insurance and patching To patch or not to patch ?
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:www.infosecinstitute.com
You can treat vulnerabilities in three ways: Remediate: Apply the patch or update to the software or system, so it's safe from exploitation. Mitigate: If remediation isn't an option because there is no patch or there are issues in updating the applications, then you move to mitigate.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC -
web:www.microsoft.com
A security vulnerability exists in Microsoft Office 2016 that could allow arbitrary code to run when a maliciously modified file is opened. This update resolves that vulnerability.
2026-06-04 00:19 UTC
AI Forensic Analysis
Only Available for Registered Users. Sign in to view.